AitkinvsBlandinSharonsPymts

                                AITKIN VS BLANDIN PAPER

http://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2016/a15-1666.htmlhttp://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2016/a15-1666.html

Thanks

In a message dated 8/18/2016 1:34:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time, julie.hughes@co.aitkin.mn.us writes:

The notice of the electronic chargeback


Thank you,
Julie Hughes
Deputy Treasurer 

Dear Official Payments Customer:

Thank you for selecting Official Payments Corporation for your electronic check payment of Real Estate Tax. Your payment of $35.00 was sent to Aitkin County on 08-18-2016. The confirmation number is 120883961.

Aitkin County, MN  Real Estate Tax Your payment information has been submitted successfully to Official Payments. Confirmation Number: 120883961 Payment Date: Payment Time: Thursday, August 18, 2016 12:09PM PT • Please print or write down your payment confirmation number for your records. • Successful completion of the payment transaction is conditioned upon accurate and complete information being entered by you and is subject to financial institution and biller acceptance, approval and authorization of the payment. • Electronic check payments may take up to seven business days to be returned by your Financial Institution if incorrect information is entered when a payment is submitted. • Do not use your browser's "Back" button. Instead, navigate using the buttons below. Payer Information Name: Sharon Lea Anderson Wid Street Address: 42741-321pl Aitkin, MN 56431 United States Daytime Phone Number: (651) 776 - 5835 E-mail Address: sharon4anderson@aol.com Parcel Number: 080031008 Check Information Account Type: Personal Checking Account Routing Number: ****00022 Account Number: *******18073 Payment Information Payment Type: Real Estate Tax Payment Amount: $35.00 Transaction Fee: $2.75 Total Payment: $37.75 Justia Opinion Summary Blandin Paper Company (Blandin) owned 4,680 parcels of timberland located in Aitkin, Itasca, St. Louis, and Koochiching Counties (the Counties). Blandin challenged tax assessments of market value for the timberland properties. Before trial, the Counties filed a motion to exclude evidence Blandin offered regarding the unit-rule method for determining the market value of the property at issue. The tax court denied the motion, determining that the unit-rule method is admissible in